RightChoice

       Bluehost Vs Namecheap

Both BlueHost and Namecheap are two web hosting services with an excellent reputation, with Namecheap being more popular in terms of name registration. And it's obvious, BlueHost and NameCheap both have negatives and positives to why you’d use them to host your next website. And we’ll show you which of them one is that the best and why.

What’s The Differences between BlueHost and Namecheap

These two web hosting services bring loads to the table, it’s why they're highly regarded within the web hosting industry. But as you see, BlueHost comes out on top with better uptime with NameCheap having better load times.

From shared hosting plans to dedicated server hosting, both BlueHost and NameCheap provide impressive statistics. But, BlueHost is suggested by WordPress, making it a difficult competitor to anyone else.

We compare some terms to find out who is better. The terms are:

• Pricing

• Performance

• Security

• Customer Support

• Who is winner

• Pricing

BlueHost’s pricing starts at a mere $3.95/mo and also includes a free domain, but NameCheap provides rock bottom web hosting at $1.58/mo but without a free domain. Both of those provide free SSL certificates, 30-day money-back guarantees.

And we know one among the massive differences when pricing cares is that NameCheap is far cheaper.

However, if you’re eager to get BlueHost even cheaper, you'll subscribe a extended term contract like three years and reduce prices less expensive on BlueHost.

The winner of the most cost effective option? It’s easily NameCheap, starting at $1.58/mo.

• Performance

Namecheap wins this one, with both uptime and cargo time. BlueHost doesn’t even advertise their uptime whereas some web hosting companies like NameCheap.

Just by contacting BlueHost you'll tell they need significant downtime.

Throughout our experience and our monitoring shows that NameCheap is currently sitting at 99.9% uptime, with little to no downtime in the least .

Both these providers have US-based servers, but it happens that BlueHost has rock bottom load times within the North American region. you'll take a better check out our BlueHost Review. While NameCheap has servers within the USA and UK, has provided significantly more load time, you'll also take a glance at NameCheap’s review and it’s performance and more.

• Security

Both BlueHost and Namecheap are excellent in terms of security, both offering free SSL certificates and have DDoS protection on all their servers to guard from any attacks.

Spam protection, CodeGuard, SiteLock are included with BlueHost, and a number of other other security measures to form sure you’re shielded from any phishing attacks or DDoS protection.

BlueHost adds tons of its security measures as add-ons, whereas NameCheap is standard within the plans. NameCheap also offers a notification service, custom password recovery, support access number which obviously all allows you to guard against hackers.

NameCheap also offers Domain Lock, which is analogous to BlueHost’s Domain Privacy features, while NameCheap has two-factor authentication to form sure you’re the sole one that accesses the account together with your domains and web hosting files.

At then end of the day, both web hosting companies provide suitable features, but NameCheap offers them without add-ons. So obviously NameCheap takes security more seriously whereas BlueHost likes to feature to their bottom line by charging for security measures .

• How Good is Support?

As for support, there are some decent similarities, both BlueHost and NameCheap offer 24/7 customer support while NameCheap features a more suitable knowledge-base with far more to supply than BlueHost’s. Also, BlueHost’s customer representatives aren’t always that knowledgeable.

And it isn’t always easy to contract live chat once you’re subscribed. You’ll got to sign off , and undergo the pre-sales route of things to contact them, whereas NameCheap is far less difficult .

NameCheap’s customer support are often reached by live chat or an easy ticket system. and therefore the representatives are far more knowledgeable than that of BlueHost. Replies are fairly responsive and may easily ask technical questions.

NameCheap is that the Overall Winner

Obviously, NameCheap isn’t the simplest web hosting service, but it sure may be a good contender. And it’s outperformed the likes of BlueHost altogether sorts of categories we’ve assessed. While offering both cheap web hosting plans and value-added features like security and performance upgrades.

If both of those aren’t what you would like or want from an internet hosting provider, inspect DreamHost or maybe a choice like Hetzner Online, which both outperform both of those web hosts, especially in terms of dedicated hosting plans.